Will Blockbuster Single Player Games be Around Forever?

Single Player Games

Rate

Total votes: 17
100

With mobile and social network gaming championing casual play and games like Call of Duty, Battlefield and others becoming the face of console gaming, is there much time left for the AAA single player experience?

Ask many a CoD gamer about which part of it they prefer, the single player or the multiplayer, and you'll often be called a noob for even considering the lone ranger portion of the game as comparable. Of course this is merely a matter of taste, but not only is this group the most vocal, but they're the ones still playing the game months after release; when the single player, story driven gamers have moved on to something else.

Develop a well made, fun, easy to pick up, difficult to master multiplayer title and sprinkle in a few irregular updates, and you have a game that will be played for a long time. Just look at games like DotA. It's a very simple concept, with some interesting complexities that people are willing to play with over and over.

The same with contemporary shooters. It's the multiplayer portions of the game that remain popular. Especially with the inclusion of RPG elements like unlockables.

This isn't to say that non multiplayer game creation is dead. You only have to look at the masterpieces that are the Portal games, the original Bioshock, or the Assassin's Creed titles to see that bandwagon jumping development isn't on every company's mind, but the potential for reduced relevance is there.

When you combine the longevity of big budget multiplayer games, and the fact that company's like Zynga are joining the ranks of the most financially successful game developers in the world, it's got to be difficult for developers to still look to the single player as a financially viable future.

However, those that prefer a single player title that isn't on their smartphone, have hope. While these latest developments in the industry might mean that more money will go into developing these easier to profit titles, it needs to be remembered that the audience for single player experiences isn't going anywhere. They're a subset of the player base, not a genre of game that can wax and wane in popularity.

It's easier to cater for as well. While multiplayer games might have a longer shelf life, they require real balance between classes and player choices to make it successful. That means patches and updates, regularly, as new exploits and overpowered combinations are discovered. There's also server costs to consider, addons and expansions to keep people playing; you can't just make a game, release it and move on to the next one.

With spiralling costs of AAA game development, perhaps it'd be best to focus everything on developing a solo game, releasing it when it's ready and then moving on to the next. Constant tweaks not only drain the coffers of a developer, but the enthusiasm of those working on it too.

With a player base that is likely to buy the next title produced by a company they feel loyal to, single player, while on the surface less of a profitable venture, will surely remain one of the best options for game makers. It allows them to not only communicate with the gaming audience the style and message of a development team, but provides a much more headache free release schedule too.

Just remember to playtest it well. Everyone hates a rushed release.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

:)

It's cheap to develop multiplayer. No AI and other stuff... but on the other hand, MP games are also nice. There should be both in existence. I personally don't like MP that much and keep looking out for single player games.

CoD?

I'm not sure why CoD would be used as an example to compare MP to SP. Everyone knows by now that the SP CoD experience is pretty fuckin' weak. I can't speak for the MP 'cuz I'm not into MP.

so my neighbour..

So my neighbor (at the time i think was like 8-9) this was during world at war.. anyway.. one day i could hear him SCREAMING.. like 3 houses away clear as day, word for word, could hear him just being an ignorant prick.. his parents were not home.. what an 8-9 yr old is doing playing that shit anyways was beyond me.. but alas.. after a good 45 mins straight of this.. i was fed up.. called him, he cussed me out, called me every name an 8 yr old can think of on the spot (quite a few actually)

not impressed with a lil spitfuck telling me off.. i walked over to his house, and cut his cables to his net/satellite

laughed, walked home.. and waited for the crying to start! was a glorious day. Took them a good week to figure out why it wasnt working... (i did a good job on the cutting, hidden well lol)

dont think i ever heard the kid after that day...

huh

You cut the kids net cable, during world war, riiiiight...

Just to make sure, you do realize the last one of those happened 70 years ago right?

your pretty calm.... I would

your pretty calm.... I would have broken in and beaten the little fucker to a pulp... and I'm not being figuritive mush would be all thats left, all these little douchbag fuckcunt kidsare getting retarded and deserve nothing but death in the most grusome of ways

"noob"

Whiny little kids, cussing, ranting, and see who has a bigger dick. All reasons why single player is where it's at, story is like watching a great movie, except you play part in it, and you don't deal with little brats on your team shooting you in your back because they didn't get their way. Online's fun, but not everyone wants to be online 100% of the time, some ppl have jobs, and don't have the luxury to make virtual friends and make an online gang to harass others and be an online thug.

Add new comment