NVIDIA's Senior Vice President of Content and Technology, Tony Tamasi, believes that it has become impossible for consoles to offer better graphics quality than PC; not even at launch.
"It's no longer possible for a console to be a better or more capable graphics platform than the PC," he told Australia's PC Power Play. "I'll tell you why. In the past, certainly with the first PlayStation and PS2, in that era there weren't really good graphics on the PC. Around the time of the PS2 is when 3D really started coming to the PC, but before that time 3D was the domain of Silicon Graphics and other 3D workstations. Sony, Sega or Nintendo could invest in bringing 3D graphics to a consumer platform. In fact, the PS2 was faster than a PC."
"By the time of the Xbox 360 and PS3, the consoles were on par with the PC. If you look inside those boxes, they're both powered by graphics technology by AMD or NVIDIA, because by that time all the graphics innovation was being done by PC graphics companies. NVIDIA spends 1.5 billion US dollars per year on research and development in graphics, every year, and in the course of a console's lifecycle we'll spend over 10 billion dollars into graphics research. Sony and Microsoft simply can't afford to spend that kind of money. They just don't have the investment capacity to match the PC guys; we can do it thanks to economy of scale, as we sell hundreds of millions of chips, year after year."
"The second factor is that everything is limited by power these days. If you want to go faster, you need a more efficient design or a bigger power supply. The laws of physics dictate that the amount of performance you're going to get from graphics is a function of the efficiency of the architecture, and how much power budget you're willing to give it. The most efficient architectures are from NVIDIA and AMD, and you're not going to get anything that is significantly more power efficient in a console, as it's using the same core technology. Yet the consoles have power budgets of only 200 or 300 Watts, so they can put them in the living room, using small fans for cooling, yet run quietly and cool. And that's always going to be less capable than a PC, where we spend 250W just on the GPU. There's no way a 200W Xbox is going to be beat a 1000W PC."
SHOW COMMENTS (44)
HIDE COMMENTS (44)
HAHA console haver never beat pc
Nvidia is on a hate compaign
Didn't want it.
Haha oh and......
if they are or not is nothing
Moore's law agrees. Silicon
maybe windows 95
Idiot, Pc has ALWAYS had
actaully there has been small
3do
LOL 3DO.
Useless arguments
hell no
uh?
like a board of morons. Of
lol
no, console graphics cannot
That fine...
im sick of hearing this
thats hilarious
Umm what kind of pc are you
yes he can and so can i
yes you can.
200£ for a PS4 or Xbone?!
You need 2k to build a pc? My
Hm
i think he means maxed out
i just built a pc for my
you will spend thousands on a
wrong, you can run stuff
Learn to read, I never said I
A decent entry level system
thats true and the beauty of
but but but, PHYSICAL DISKS
this is not correct
dont deny it
what you say is mostly
this is not entirely correct
Oh really?
Dont comment like a noob
Correct, the main difference
The architecture between the
Actually, ZeroFrog from the
Makes sense, thank you for
Add new comment