John Carmack says that nv is better for doom3, and the bechmark says that nv are faster that ati in doom3. If you buy a ati dont tell us that your hardware is the best and the other hardware is a ahit please.
but deus ex is make identical for xbox and pc, and doom3 is made for pc and then ported to xbox, isnt the same. but if you dont have a minimun spec pc buy a xbox and dont buy a new pc.
even with the best pc out.........you are NOT going to be able to crank aa and af and res up to max.........no question about it........as for the xbox.......it is a powerfull system.....but if you do have the best pc out....like me.....get it on pc,, cause you will at least be able to run it at 1280x1024, and that is alot better than 800x600, or less for xbox.in the short and long run, a strong pc will always beat a console, it is just something you console lovers have to deal with. i used to be a console guy, then my friend showed me unreal tournament on pc, and i loved it, and i ended up getting it for the ps2, and after that, i was all on pc's and nothing else. unreal tournament for dreamcast is even better than the ps2 version.....although, they both really suck........when it comes to fps (frames per second), a pc will always come ahead. xbox only has 64MB of RAM to work with, well, i have 1 gig of pc 3200 corsair on my pc, and when a map gets loaded, it is flawless on most games out today....unreal tournament 2003 runs flawlessly with all turned up.....and for the xbox, there is no way in h ell, that you can get a game to run like that......on a tv, the highest fps (frames per second) you will see, and it will perform, is 30 fps, or lower. as for pc, i get up to and above 100 fps for unreal tournament 2003.a strong pc will always win......no questions, and even if it isnt tuned all the way max.......oh, and for the d icks that always post as 1st, 2nd and so on,,,,,man, you girls need to get lives, or la id, or something....if i knew you.....i would k ill you.....no questions....you must be extreamly shallow, or stupid to type a line stating what place you are in on a forum....i just do not understand your stupid logic......f uckin fa gs
yes u are right pc r the best but if u dont have a top line pc u should try this game 4 xbox i heard all graphics r guna be the same except for resolution will be worse on xbox cuz u watch it on a tv with only 480 lines of res.(except 4 japs and chinese who have 525 as there standard) .But u complain that xbox has only 64mb ...true but it doesnt need alot of memory to play a game cuz there is nothin runnin in the background and it doesnt got windows loaded and the game when ported will be made to take advantage of the xbox's arhitecture so xbox doesnt really need high specs to get good graphics
I have a 2.6ghz, 800mhz FSB, 1 gig dual channel DDR, S-ATA hard drive and a 9800pro 128 meg.Doom 3 alpha FPS rates:Everything turned on, 2xaa, 1024x768.avg fps: 35max fps: 60lowest fps: 12The max fps for doom3 is 60fps. this is because doom3 uses openGL instead of direct3d.When the full version of the game comes out, fps will be better. 9800pro's are very expensive; however, i still wouldn't reccomend buying an aging console like the xbox. Lets look at 9700pro's. These cards are very fast and trail the 9800pro's by just 10-20fps in most games. These cards are still priced aggresively, about $100 to $150 less than the 9800pro. Unless radeon comes out with a revolutionary card that kicks the 9800 series @$$, we can't expect a huge decrease in price for these cards in 2004, maybe $100 less by the end of spring.What does this mean? well the 5900ultra's cost more money, and there is a lot of bad air around them. I'm not bias towards any card. I look at fps benchmark facts. Any game 3 months ago ran faster on a 5900ultra, then along comes DX9 games and the FX series all of a sudden sucks horribly. Doom3 runs better on a 5900ultra than it does on a 9800pro, because it uses openGL. However, the 9800pro rapes the 5900ultra in half-life2, and all other upcoming Direct3D games. Doom3 is the only thing the FX series has going for it. Either way, to run doom3 at good fps, you are going to need a $400 card. Do you want to spend $400-$500 on a card that won't run the games coming out in 2-3 months nicely? If you are going to spend the money right at this moment, grab a 9800pro or XT. If nvidia comes out with something faster in the next couple months, buy that! Stop being loyal to the company, be loyal to the FACTS.Either way, I support buying any PC part over a console. Doom3 will have to be horribly dumbed down for xbox. Halo slows down on xbox for christ sake. They can't make doom3 magically look better than halo on the same hardware. Sorry console f
DONT DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO!! The demo will be released on Friday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am 100% sure of this! Go to [url removed] and BTW it's the doom3 alpha not the beta!
the max is 60 because carmack cut the engine nothing about opengl - directx (so you say that 60 fps max because is opengl? jajaja. study a bit). and the alpha dont was cut, you could have more that 60 fps without problem. and pleeeaseeee dont tell us your ati histories, carmack recommend nv for doom3 and the benchmarks of doom3 says that nv is faster that ati. if the programmers will use the lower precision of the nv it will be faster that ati without loss of quality.
did you read anything i said? i said nvidia was faster in doom3. is your bias ignorant mind so clouded that everything skipped past it into aggression, protecting your favourite card? Doom3 is faster with nvidia. maybe i need to say it again. doom3 is faster with nvidia. too bad nvidia is MUCH slower for every single other upcoming game. that's a shame huh? if you want nvidia, wait until they upgrade from the ****** FX series. geforce3's and 4's owned. then came the 9700 which owned. now its 9800. i bet its nvidia's turn to be on top next.if every programmer used nv's coding, games would be released months and months after their scheduled release dates. Why would programmers and companies willingly want to spend their time, and hundreds of thousands of dollars to do this? it's a **** off....which is why nvidia provides financial support to companies to do this.
hey man, you are saying what we bought an ati. The id engines are the most used engines in fps, and if the nv are faster that the ati in this engine is illogical you recommended us an ati (ati is better in directx games, but the big ones games the next years (games with this engine) are going to run better on nv). conclusion: buy the card you want, for fps nv, for general use ati. dont reccomend us any card you understand?. And you understand the 60 fps problem and what is directx and opengl?
D3D is a 3D rendering driver which is generally slower than OpenGL. ALL the Quake series used OpenGLNot only that, but D3D is in general a memory/processor hog, while OpenGL runs smoother, faster and more efficient.Back when GlQuake came out, most people didn't have support for OpenGL, even for quake 2, some cards still didn't support it. By quake 3, all the standard cards have it, and today, well, they all do.
Ok this is fact Yes OpenGL Was faster in the time of say directx 6 but thats no longer true directx is now faster and opengl is on the way out opengl 2.0 will be the last opengl to be released and doomIII will run faster on NVIDIA cards and HALFLIFE 2 will run faster on ati cards its just the facts when development was started each card company put there focus on a different game thats just that
hum, opengl 2 is not the last opengl to be released. opengl is used in non-gaming aplications and his code is portable and non os depending. is true what directx 9 is good, but opengl is still a bit better and is a joke say that opengl is going to disapear because part of industrial sector use it. dont forget the non-windows users, directx is ONLY an API for one os.
i have a 3.2 oc to 3.9 ghz on a asus deluxe ,2gigs of ram dual channel, raid serial ata 240gighdd, audigy2 platnium and a 5900 ultra 256 there is nothing else i need....EXPECT THE f**kEN GAME!!WHAT IS TAKING SO LONG?
amun - what, no raptor hard drive?! lol.also, i don't want to start a huge debate but i was just hoping for some input as to why you went geforce instead of radeon with such a high end system. since you're doing some heavey ocing i was wondering if you thought you would have better luck ocing the 5900 ultra compraired to radeon 9800 pro or xt? or did you just go for geforce on principle?let me reiterate, i dont want a huge ati/nvidea debate, there are lots of other forms for that on MG, i was just havent encountered many people with a 5900 ultra in such a high end system. i dont care which is better in general, i just want to know why amun went geforce.-thanx
Yeah... Heres some facts:Doom III does run a bit better on nV hardware. Why? Because of a lower precision codepath. If you run nV hardware on the true 100% high precision codepath it suffers, and ATi prevails. Carmark himself said this.The R300 series of the Radeon were specifically designed for DX9. The FX series was not. It's more of a DX8 card with DX9 features.Kaapeesh?
im gonna run this game on my voodoo3 just to be like 'yeah.' nvidia is weak sauce, so is ati because ati stand for um, 'a total idiot' and they were gonna call themselves atiyriyboc but canadians are lazy, the original concept was 'a total idiot you are if you buy our cards' i know i was back in the day w/ the radeon 7500, if you think im wrong, ill sick my hermit crabs on you
"amun - what, no raptor hard drive?! lol.also, i don't want to start a huge debate but i was just hoping for some input as to why you went geforce instead of radeon with such a high end system. since you're doing some heavey ocing i was wondering if you thought you would have better luck ocing the 5900 ultra compraired to radeon 9800 pro or xt? or did you just go for geforce on principle?let me reiterate, i dont want a huge ati/nvidea debate, there are lots of other forms for that on MG, i was just havent encountered many people with a 5900 ultra in such a high end system. i dont care which is better in general, i just want to know why amun went geforce.-thanx"Bacause i got it for $300us dollars,for the leadtek,over clocked the **** out of it and still gets awesome frames and the new 53 drivers help alot with image quality! and p.s the radeon does not out perform my card in real world games (i dont f**ken care about 3dmarks!! even though i get 6500 in the latest patched version of 2003 3dmark)and doom3 is coming out alot sooner that HL2 so thats why if HL really runs that **** on it if and when it comes out i just buy a Radeon....!:-) happy?
Just a quick note to that idiot who insulted my previous post on Doom 3: Xbox. what does he know? He calls the Xbox a pile of **** despite the fact that it can handle a higher polygon count than my Radeon 9600 , even though it runs at 640x480. and dont tell me 640x480 looks crap because through a television it looks quite sharp, not fuzzy like on a PC monitor. he's obviously not really used an Xbox b4.i think for the time being, you should all reserve judgement until the game actually comes out. no one can say how it will run. hell, it may surprise that small-minded guy with its performance. all i wanted to say was that even if the xbox version did look a little bland, no pc video card is likely 2 be powerful enough to put the settings right up anyway, so will we notice a huge difference? Don't post a reply to this calling me a d**khead UNTIL you've played the freaking game. because none of us can say how it will run. I only hope it runs well on the box to prove that idiot wrong.
you run low rez **** man.... we have AA you have ****... Xbox is garbage and a 9600 beats it if you knew what was in your Xbox you wouldnt be saying any thing.... and further more no game played on a TV looks sharp... stupid fan boys who dont know **** **** me off... all of you people need to do more research befor you say **** about stuff you really have no idea what your talking about!
HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN!!!
ma dioccà ma quanto siete sfigati porco dio? sempre a dire parolacce? ma siete proprio dei mignottoni senza fondo. DUR_XBOX guy!, tua madre succhia i cazzi all'inferno, AMUN tua nonna è un po' cara, ma fa di quei pompini che te li raccomando. Ma sicuramente ci sarai già abituato. AMUN, quella vacca di quella troia di tua sorella lo prende nel culo anche di domenica, quando in realtà non dovrebbe a stare a battere.. ma cazzo se le piacciono gli uccelli. E tu morirai di un tumore fulminante.. vorrei dire al cervello, ma non ce l'hai. Pensavo al pisello, ma non hai nemmeno quello. Un cancro al culo, quello sì che ti farà rinsavire. Salutami tutta la tua famiglia di sfigati froci, AMUN. Dio mostro.
Submitted by diablous in america (not verified) on
first off i have been one of the lucky people to play this games demo at quakecon and the game its self is awsome it sucks you in and freaks you out better than any game i have played in awile and i must first say that i hated doom one and two. i prefer quake myself. there was a level in doom 3 where the hwole building was distroyed and broken down and most the people were dead and you had to find a scientist who was alive and with a lanturn to guide you to the power roon and while your doing this you hear all the monsters coming from all sides in the dark and you still cant see them and as you go along they all start coming out after you.you have to keep the scientist alive to get and farther its a scary *** game and poeple should play before judging
Yeah fellas! BRANC AD CUION!! TO MADAR LA FA I PUM PIN! VACA TO ZIA E TO NONA E TO SURELA! VA A CAGA IN UN TUSDAZ FAZA DA CUL DA CAN DA CAZ!!! Scolta... digal al cal cuion ad sciaddam.. cas faga dar intal cul! At capì? IdiotHa!!Ac zog ad merda! Cussela cal ragnuz?? Al fa cagar un epiletic!!! Ciao rambo!
Scolta... mi al volev dir che sto sito al fa cagar... po' ognun al po dir quel caz cal vol ma mi a son convint dele mie opinion... Doom3 l'è na merda stampada sulla taza dal ces! Impara a zugar a pacman che tal spendi men baioc! Zio maial!
SHOW COMMENTS (107)
HIDE COMMENTS (107)
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onJohn Carmack says that nv is better for doom3, and the bechmark says that nv are faster that ati in doom3. If you buy a ati dont tell us that your hardware is the best and the other hardware is a ahit please.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onbut deus ex is make identical for xbox and pc, and doom3 is made for pc and then ported to xbox, isnt the same. but if you dont have a minimun spec pc buy a xbox and dont buy a new pc.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on56th post, eat shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) oneven with the best pc out.........you are NOT going to be able to crank aa and af and res up to max.........no question about it........as for the xbox.......it is a powerfull system.....but if you do have the best pc out....like me.....get it on pc,, cause you will at least be able to run it at 1280x1024, and that is alot better than 800x600, or less for xbox.in the short and long run, a strong pc will always beat a console, it is just something you console lovers have to deal with. i used to be a console guy, then my friend showed me unreal tournament on pc, and i loved it, and i ended up getting it for the ps2, and after that, i was all on pc's and nothing else. unreal tournament for dreamcast is even better than the ps2 version.....although, they both really suck........when it comes to fps (frames per second), a pc will always come ahead. xbox only has 64MB of RAM to work with, well, i have 1 gig of pc 3200 corsair on my pc, and when a map gets loaded, it is flawless on most games out today....unreal tournament 2003 runs flawlessly with all turned up.....and for the xbox, there is no way in h ell, that you can get a game to run like that......on a tv, the highest fps (frames per second) you will see, and it will perform, is 30 fps, or lower. as for pc, i get up to and above 100 fps for unreal tournament 2003.a strong pc will always win......no questions, and even if it isnt tuned all the way max.......oh, and for the d icks that always post as 1st, 2nd and so on,,,,,man, you girls need to get lives, or la id, or something....if i knew you.....i would k ill you.....no questions....you must be extreamly shallow, or stupid to type a line stating what place you are in on a forum....i just do not understand your stupid logic......f uckin fa gs
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onyes u are right pc r the best but if u dont have a top line pc u should try this game 4 xbox i heard all graphics r guna be the same except for resolution will be worse on xbox cuz u watch it on a tv with only 480 lines of res.(except 4 japs and chinese who have 525 as there standard) .But u complain that xbox has only 64mb ...true but it doesnt need alot of memory to play a game cuz there is nothin runnin in the background and it doesnt got windows loaded and the game when ported will be made to take advantage of the xbox's arhitecture so xbox doesnt really need high specs to get good graphics
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onThe beta runs like **** because it is un-optimized! stop your ******** and wait for the full game to come out!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Con (not verified) onI have a 2.6ghz, 800mhz FSB, 1 gig dual channel DDR, S-ATA hard drive and a 9800pro 128 meg.Doom 3 alpha FPS rates:Everything turned on, 2xaa, 1024x768.avg fps: 35max fps: 60lowest fps: 12The max fps for doom3 is 60fps. this is because doom3 uses openGL instead of direct3d.When the full version of the game comes out, fps will be better. 9800pro's are very expensive; however, i still wouldn't reccomend buying an aging console like the xbox. Lets look at 9700pro's. These cards are very fast and trail the 9800pro's by just 10-20fps in most games. These cards are still priced aggresively, about $100 to $150 less than the 9800pro. Unless radeon comes out with a revolutionary card that kicks the 9800 series @$$, we can't expect a huge decrease in price for these cards in 2004, maybe $100 less by the end of spring.What does this mean? well the 5900ultra's cost more money, and there is a lot of bad air around them. I'm not bias towards any card. I look at fps benchmark facts. Any game 3 months ago ran faster on a 5900ultra, then along comes DX9 games and the FX series all of a sudden sucks horribly. Doom3 runs better on a 5900ultra than it does on a 9800pro, because it uses openGL. However, the 9800pro rapes the 5900ultra in half-life2, and all other upcoming Direct3D games. Doom3 is the only thing the FX series has going for it. Either way, to run doom3 at good fps, you are going to need a $400 card. Do you want to spend $400-$500 on a card that won't run the games coming out in 2-3 months nicely? If you are going to spend the money right at this moment, grab a 9800pro or XT. If nvidia comes out with something faster in the next couple months, buy that! Stop being loyal to the company, be loyal to the FACTS.Either way, I support buying any PC part over a console. Doom3 will have to be horribly dumbed down for xbox. Halo slows down on xbox for christ sake. They can't make doom3 magically look better than halo on the same hardware. Sorry console f
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Some on who lov... (not verified) onDONT DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO!! The demo will be released on Friday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am 100% sure of this! Go to [url removed] and BTW it's the doom3 alpha not the beta!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onthe max is 60 because carmack cut the engine nothing about opengl - directx (so you say that 60 fps max because is opengl? jajaja. study a bit). and the alpha dont was cut, you could have more that 60 fps without problem. and pleeeaseeee dont tell us your ati histories, carmack recommend nv for doom3 and the benchmarks of doom3 says that nv is faster that ati. if the programmers will use the lower precision of the nv it will be faster that ati without loss of quality.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Con (not verified) ondid you read anything i said? i said nvidia was faster in doom3. is your bias ignorant mind so clouded that everything skipped past it into aggression, protecting your favourite card? Doom3 is faster with nvidia. maybe i need to say it again. doom3 is faster with nvidia. too bad nvidia is MUCH slower for every single other upcoming game. that's a shame huh? if you want nvidia, wait until they upgrade from the ****** FX series. geforce3's and 4's owned. then came the 9700 which owned. now its 9800. i bet its nvidia's turn to be on top next.if every programmer used nv's coding, games would be released months and months after their scheduled release dates. Why would programmers and companies willingly want to spend their time, and hundreds of thousands of dollars to do this? it's a **** off....which is why nvidia provides financial support to companies to do this.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onhey man, you are saying what we bought an ati. The id engines are the most used engines in fps, and if the nv are faster that the ati in this engine is illogical you recommended us an ati (ati is better in directx games, but the big ones games the next years (games with this engine) are going to run better on nv). conclusion: buy the card you want, for fps nv, for general use ati. dont reccomend us any card you understand?. And you understand the 60 fps problem and what is directx and opengl?
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by timo (not verified) oniihihj
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Slim (not verified) onD3D is a 3D rendering driver which is generally slower than OpenGL. ALL the Quake series used OpenGLNot only that, but D3D is in general a memory/processor hog, while OpenGL runs smoother, faster and more efficient.Back when GlQuake came out, most people didn't have support for OpenGL, even for quake 2, some cards still didn't support it. By quake 3, all the standard cards have it, and today, well, they all do.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by NDferro (not verified) onOk this is fact Yes OpenGL Was faster in the time of say directx 6 but thats no longer true directx is now faster and opengl is on the way out opengl 2.0 will be the last opengl to be released and doomIII will run faster on NVIDIA cards and HALFLIFE 2 will run faster on ati cards its just the facts when development was started each card company put there focus on a different game thats just that
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onhum, opengl 2 is not the last opengl to be released. opengl is used in non-gaming aplications and his code is portable and non os depending. is true what directx 9 is good, but opengl is still a bit better and is a joke say that opengl is going to disapear because part of industrial sector use it. dont forget the non-windows users, directx is ONLY an API for one os.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by amun (not verified) oni have a 3.2 oc to 3.9 ghz on a asus deluxe ,2gigs of ram dual channel, raid serial ata 240gighdd, audigy2 platnium and a 5900 ultra 256 there is nothing else i need....EXPECT THE f**kEN GAME!!WHAT IS TAKING SO LONG?
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onthere want a max fps in the alpha ... u could change it in the config file
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onamun...no you dont you **** you cant OC a P4 that high on that board you faggit.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Talinth (not verified) onamun - what, no raptor hard drive?! lol.also, i don't want to start a huge debate but i was just hoping for some input as to why you went geforce instead of radeon with such a high end system. since you're doing some heavey ocing i was wondering if you thought you would have better luck ocing the 5900 ultra compraired to radeon 9800 pro or xt? or did you just go for geforce on principle?let me reiterate, i dont want a huge ati/nvidea debate, there are lots of other forms for that on MG, i was just havent encountered many people with a 5900 ultra in such a high end system. i dont care which is better in general, i just want to know why amun went geforce.-thanx
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Twigathy (not verified) onWill this game run on my 9600 Pro?
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by UseCommentsRight (not verified) onYeah... Heres some facts:Doom III does run a bit better on nV hardware. Why? Because of a lower precision codepath. If you run nV hardware on the true 100% high precision codepath it suffers, and ATi prevails. Carmark himself said this.The R300 series of the Radeon were specifically designed for DX9. The FX series was not. It's more of a DX8 card with DX9 features.Kaapeesh?
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by butteredtoast (not verified) onim gonna run this game on my voodoo3 just to be like 'yeah.' nvidia is weak sauce, so is ati because ati stand for um, 'a total idiot' and they were gonna call themselves atiyriyboc but canadians are lazy, the original concept was 'a total idiot you are if you buy our cards' i know i was back in the day w/ the radeon 7500, if you think im wrong, ill sick my hermit crabs on you
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by butler (not verified) onSome on who loves 3d FPS, how are you so sure the demos commin out on friday!??!?! i went to the forums it didnt say sh@%
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by AMUN (not verified) on"amun - what, no raptor hard drive?! lol.also, i don't want to start a huge debate but i was just hoping for some input as to why you went geforce instead of radeon with such a high end system. since you're doing some heavey ocing i was wondering if you thought you would have better luck ocing the 5900 ultra compraired to radeon 9800 pro or xt? or did you just go for geforce on principle?let me reiterate, i dont want a huge ati/nvidea debate, there are lots of other forms for that on MG, i was just havent encountered many people with a 5900 ultra in such a high end system. i dont care which is better in general, i just want to know why amun went geforce.-thanx"Bacause i got it for $300us dollars,for the leadtek,over clocked the **** out of it and still gets awesome frames and the new 53 drivers help alot with image quality! and p.s the radeon does not out perform my card in real world games (i dont f**ken care about 3dmarks!! even though i get 6500 in the latest patched version of 2003 3dmark)and doom3 is coming out alot sooner that HL2 so thats why if HL really runs that **** on it if and when it comes out i just buy a Radeon....!:-) happy?
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Bobjob64 (not verified) onJust a quick note to that idiot who insulted my previous post on Doom 3: Xbox. what does he know? He calls the Xbox a pile of **** despite the fact that it can handle a higher polygon count than my Radeon 9600 , even though it runs at 640x480. and dont tell me 640x480 looks crap because through a television it looks quite sharp, not fuzzy like on a PC monitor. he's obviously not really used an Xbox b4.i think for the time being, you should all reserve judgement until the game actually comes out. no one can say how it will run. hell, it may surprise that small-minded guy with its performance. all i wanted to say was that even if the xbox version did look a little bland, no pc video card is likely 2 be powerful enough to put the settings right up anyway, so will we notice a huge difference? Don't post a reply to this calling me a d**khead UNTIL you've played the freaking game. because none of us can say how it will run. I only hope it runs well on the box to prove that idiot wrong.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onI get the feeling this game is going to be dissapointing. Return to castle Wolfenstein was dumb. However, being Doom, I am hopeful it will be good.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by DUR_XBOX guy! (not verified) onyou run low rez **** man.... we have AA you have ****... Xbox is garbage and a 9600 beats it if you knew what was in your Xbox you wouldnt be saying any thing.... and further more no game played on a TV looks sharp... stupid fan boys who dont know **** **** me off... all of you people need to do more research befor you say **** about stuff you really have no idea what your talking about!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onall game consoles are dumb.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by SATANISGOD (not verified) onHAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN HAIL SATAN!!!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Bromotsatsos (not verified) oneiste oloi sas malakes
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by gmz (not verified) onalways speak truth
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by MUSAH (not verified) onBRIANLOVE YOU
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by doom sucks (not verified) oni always hate doom games. including this one. it may look great but believe me, it'll be a dull game!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onWANNA PLAY DOOM3? USE NVIDIA! IT'S BETTER COMPARED TO THE LAME OVERRATED ATI!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by io (not verified) onma dioccà ma quanto siete sfigati porco dio? sempre a dire parolacce? ma siete proprio dei mignottoni senza fondo. DUR_XBOX guy!, tua madre succhia i cazzi all'inferno, AMUN tua nonna è un po' cara, ma fa di quei pompini che te li raccomando. Ma sicuramente ci sarai già abituato. AMUN, quella vacca di quella troia di tua sorella lo prende nel culo anche di domenica, quando in realtà non dovrebbe a stare a battere.. ma cazzo se le piacciono gli uccelli. E tu morirai di un tumore fulminante.. vorrei dire al cervello, ma non ce l'hai. Pensavo al pisello, ma non hai nemmeno quello. Un cancro al culo, quello sì che ti farà rinsavire. Salutami tutta la tua famiglia di sfigati froci, AMUN. Dio mostro.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by io (not verified) onDUR_XBOX guy! ti odio!!!!!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) oni think it's quite awesome, but nothing compared to HL2, that, in my opinion, is much more spectacular
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onhey *******, use english! bet you work at mcdonald's :-P
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onDoom... That's exactly what this game's future will be... Doomed.
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) onWhy dont u ALL get a life, get out mroe instead on worring about ****** little things like this
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by diablous in america (not verified) onfirst off i have been one of the lucky people to play this games demo at quakecon and the game its self is awsome it sucks you in and freaks you out better than any game i have played in awile and i must first say that i hated doom one and two. i prefer quake myself. there was a level in doom 3 where the hwole building was distroyed and broken down and most the people were dead and you had to find a scientist who was alive and with a lanturn to guide you to the power roon and while your doing this you hear all the monsters coming from all sides in the dark and you still cant see them and as you go along they all start coming out after you.you have to keep the scientist alive to get and farther its a scary *** game and poeple should play before judging
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by pCyChO (not verified) onElpizo na en wraio to doom3 giati en na pao na to pio.gamoto ssisto sas an den enei kalo!!!!!!!!!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by SKaT3R (not verified) ongamo sas oulous sto generals
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by pCyChO (not verified) ongamosas oullous damesa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Eisaste pousties kai malakismenoigamota poutoudkia sas!!!ppezebenges!!!!!!!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Lenin (not verified) onCiao sono un comunistaccio ignorante, non so giocare al computer, perchè non lavoro e sto al centro sociale tutto il giorno. Fanculos a tuttos!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by ax (not verified) onYeah fellas! BRANC AD CUION!! TO MADAR LA FA I PUM PIN! VACA TO ZIA E TO NONA E TO SURELA! VA A CAGA IN UN TUSDAZ FAZA DA CUL DA CAN DA CAZ!!! Scolta... digal al cal cuion ad sciaddam.. cas faga dar intal cul! At capì? IdiotHa!!Ac zog ad merda! Cussela cal ragnuz?? Al fa cagar un epiletic!!! Ciao rambo!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by BrUbacker (not verified) onScolta... mi al volev dir che sto sito al fa cagar... po' ognun al po dir quel caz cal vol ma mi a son convint dele mie opinion... Doom3 l'è na merda stampada sulla taza dal ces! Impara a zugar a pacman che tal spendi men baioc! Zio maial!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by John (not verified) onHey yo!!! This is my site about Doom3!! See yo!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by Doomer (not verified) onDoom3 is the best game ever seem before culo di tua nonna!!!
DOOM 3 E3 2003 Hi-Res Trailer [updated]
Submitted by IL CRITICO (not verified) onMa quanto fanno cagare le emoticons qui di fianco?!!?
Pages
Add new comment