Is Kickstarter really good for gaming?



Total votes: 93

Kickstarter has been live and 'kicking' for a while now and it's certainly become the vogue way of having your dream project get off the ground. It's allowed people to setup the businesses they always wanted and complete projects that without funding simply wouldn't have been possible.

However there's a problem with Kickstarter. As it's grown in popularity certain trends are emerging that - I think - hold a worrying future for it.

First up, is the obvious reduction in interest that is beginning to set in among the funding public. At this point, most people that are happy to pledge money to a future cause have invested in several already. That's money they may not see the fruits of for weeks, months and in the case of some games like Star Citizen, years. That's fine on its own, but these people aren't going to keep giving money to causes without seeing a payoff. Those people are done. Their wallets are tapped.

We saw this when Kickstarter launched in the UK. It didn't do anywhere near as well as was expected and British projects struggled to take off in the way American ones did.

This is most evident with the status of Peter Molyneux's Project Godus, a game that purportedly will allow for a rebirth of the god sim, using games like Dungeon Keeper, Black and White and Populous for inspiration. These are some of gaming's most loved titles from yesteryear and even with a man at the helm like Peter Molyneux, Godus only just managed to meet its funding goal.

The bottom is already dropping out of the crowd funding phenomenon and we have barely gotten started.

However once you do get started, if you've funded yourself through Kickstarter, I'm worried about the pressure developers are putting themselves under. Anyone that's seen the Indie Game documentary that follows the Fez guys around for a while, it's clear that building an indie game is mind blowingly stressful. Simply dealing with the hype and delays of a game is hard enough – imagine piling on the pressure of having people's money before giving them much to play with?

But what about the games that don't reach their goal? What about that pressure? You've conceptualised your idea, you put it out there and nobody is interested. Maybe your pitch was bad, maybe it was too expensive or too cheap, maybe the rewards sucked. Whatever the reason, part of the developer will be thinking that it's because nobody wants to buy the game. Potential investors may think that too.

Ideas that peak too early are doomed to fail. Kickstarter has the potential to bring attention to projects too early in their infancy and like 90% of Hollywood child actors, they're done before they've fully matured.

Another problem with the crowd funding model is that it prioritises style over substance. While a great idea is what really secures the pledges, it's not often possible without a good video, a solid rewards setup and a personal yet professional style.

We’ve talked about the dangers of this sort of thing before when discussing Greenlight, but to sum it up in a short sentence: Kickstarter by its very nature is funding games that look the best, not the ones that necessarily are the best. A good pitch, does not a great game make.

So Kickstarter, is it good for gaming as a whole? I'm not so sure. I think it certainly has brought about some very interesting developments, but it's also promoting a culture of game development that whether it lasts or not, could damage the industry in many ways.

What do you guys think?

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Cream Always Rises

Anyone with any idea is going to think its a good one and try to get it funded. It is good that Kickstarter is there to help these people. However not all idea are good. Yes some will not get funded, but the people who really believe in their game will make that game. As you mentioned the Indie Game documentary shows how hard it can be making a game, but also showed up the determination of the developers to make their games. There is waiting time with Kickstarter projects, but in a couple of years I think we will be seeing lots of great projects coming out that started with Kickstarter. Just think how many bands, games, films, etc... all got turned down by the major players but went on to be some of the best. In gaming, Kickstarter is a great way for these under dog projects to get going.

Kickstarter is a crap service

Kickstarter is a crap service held by a monopoly of cloud users, most of anything they sell over their service is financially strong to begin with. Don't believe it? Try launching anything yourselves, you'll be met by a crowd bouncer and your not on their list. What is even more bizarre than that is that 90% of what they advertise over their service is near supported or closed for funding. The service also claims that their advertisers choose the investment options, I find it odd that someone would willingly invest to the max in thousands for literally anything just to support a cause. But what do I know I'm just a talking mouse squeek!


I'm getting kinda tired of these stupid articles on MG especially when some idiot talks out of his *** without knowing what's truly happening.


If the alternative is not having kickstarter, then a lot of us would never again see games in our favorite genre. Traditional RPGs, space sims, strategy games, etc., etc. have all either been warped by the big studios to something no longer recognized as such, or they're simply not being made anymore period. Kickstarter gives us a great option for the 'not hobby quality, but not AAA either' segment. Of course there'll be trouble, projects never being finished, etc., but such is the way of all things. On the whole, it's definitely gonna be positive. As for Peter Molyneux's Godux, I'd argue many people aren't pledging *because* he's behind it. The guy's an *******, always promising what he can't deliver.
You voted 'no'.

Add new comment