Intel Claims It Has Beaten ARM In Smartphone CPUs

Even though they haven't delivered a single unit yet, Intel has made a bold claim that their first Atom-based smartphone processor will outperform the best processors offered by ARM by a large margin.

The claim was made by Anand Chandrasekher, senior vice president and general manager of Intel's Ultra Mobility Group, during his session at the Mobile World Conference 2011 in Barcelona, Spain.

According to Anand, Intel's upcoming smartphone - codenamed "Medfield" - will have standby time similar to ARM cores' but it will "blow away" them in terms of processing speed and active time.

Intel's first smartphone CPU chips are scheduled for release late this year and they will include a built-in HSPA+ modem, thanks to the technology Intel acquired from its $1.4B USD purchase of Infineon.

The most important problem facing Intel right now is that it would be impossible to convince hardware manufacturers to embrace the new chip if the performance difference isn't as earth shattering as Intel claims.

Outperforming ARM's chips in terms of performance and power efficiency is crucial for Intel now since ARM has already announced a quad-core 2.5 GHz ARM chip that will be available next year and will be able to run Windows 8.

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Intel won't have a chance in mobile graphics.

nVidia is basing their Tegra chips of the ARM architecture and the Tegra II was demoed at the last CES running the UT3 engine on a board smaller than a netbook. intel, as usual, may entice some business market but we all know that smart phones aren't just all business anymore. I think the iPhone and Android proved that, which means whomever can put out richer faster multimedia content and games will ultimately win. nVidia is out for blood in the mobile market and they are backing ARM. When was the last great video card Intel developed. Oh yeah, they never did.

Add new comment