Runner 2 Is Better On Wii U Than On PS3 And Xbox 360

With the final PC, Wiiu, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions of "Bit. Trip Runner2: Future Legend of Rhythm Alien" at hand, its developer Andrew H. decided to discuss the differences between them.

Needless to say, the PC version enjoys the best graphics and shortest loading time, but only if it meets the game’s recommended specs. As for consoles, PlayStation 3 looks less pretty than Xbox 360 which looks identical to Wii U but suffers from longer loading time.

"For technical reasons, we had to remove a few features from the PS3 version: depth of field, shadow filtering, and micro leaderboards at the end of every level. As a result of having no depth of field, the game is sharper and colors more vibrant."

As an added bonus, the Wii U version can be played on the TV screen or on its tablet controller.

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


This is a shock (!)

Surprise, surprise. The Wii U's version looks best and has the best loading times out of all the consoles. It would be quite a disappointment if 1 year old technology was performing worse than 7 year old tech, don't you think? Buying this tomorrow, ASAP.

Ok so If I had all 3 systems

Ok so If I had all 3 systems it'd be better to get it on Wii right? Cause if I have a Xbox or PS or both its not like I'm gonna go buy a Wii just to play it, if I wanted it. Why not just say it runs better on PC than all the other 3?

Shhhh, everyone knows that

Shhhh, everyone knows that the PC can't handle the awesome power capabilities equal to the 360, PS3, Wii and WiiU. This argument is of course supported by random forum threads posted with no proof throughout the internet stating that consoles are so much better than PC.

Add new comment