Does sex belong in video games?

Mass Effect Sex

Rate

Total votes: 618
100

Tits and ass are incredibly prevalent in modern society. Sex is used to sell products in advertising, actors are shamefully primped into digitally crafted sex symbols and TV shows like Toddlers in Tiaras, stretch the definition of acceptable television viewing. Sex is everywhere, but oddly, not in our games.

With the recent pulling of No Reply Games' sex focused, interactive story 'game' “Seduce Me” from Valve's Greenlight service due to breaking of the terms and conditions – for being an “offensive” title – sex is back in the headlines of gaming websites the world over, all of them asking the question, “does sex belong in video games?”

It could be argued that games purely focused around sex are pornographic in nature and therefore warrant some sort of segmentation perhaps, in the way it is with websites and traditionally with stores that cater specifically to it.

But what about games that just feature sex as a feature or component of the overall experience?

Every time a popular title attempts to put anything sex like in its games that goes beyond a fade to black and some grunts, there's a problem. Look at GTA: San Andreas' Hot Coffee mod, or the blue side boob that appeared for a brief second in Mass Effect 2. It all gets blown out of proportion, people that haven't even played the game or seen footage of the event start screaming “save the children,” and to some it seems as if the world is going to end.

Of course it never does and children are as corrupted as their parents allow them to be. These games have age ratings for a reason and if parents choose to ignore them it's their responsibility to set it right, or at least explain things to their kids so they understand and learn about the adult activity in a constructive way.

But should it be there in the first place? Well the obvious answer would be yes, for a variety of reasons.

1: Taking into consideration the age ratings I mentioned earlier, the average gamer is in their 30s at this point. Not only have they had sex, they've been living with internet pornography for over 15 years. Believe me, unless you're doing a game adaptation of The Serbian Film, this is nothing we haven't seen before.

2: Unless it's Manhunt, where ritualistic killing was censored because... it's the game the lobby groups decided to go after, murder barely raises an eyebrow from anyone. Killing is rampant in games. Just look at the fast Paragon leveller in Diablo III. He's killed almost two million monsters alone. If he can commit mass murder, why can't a game have a sex scene in it?

3: Sex is a part of life. For anyone that doesn't know, it's how babies are made. Shocking I know, but we all began our life at a moment of parental coitus and society is slowly beginning to lose the taboo. It's still there – and enjoyed by many – but the simple fact is that sex shouldn't be considered a naughty thing any more. It's in films, in advertising, television and there is absolutely no reason it shouldn't be in our games.

However, despite these very obvious reasons that sex should be included in games and accepted by the public as a simple part of the artistic medium, the blame isn't entirely on the shoulders of complainers. Game developers could also help the cause out.

Despite the criticism for its leud content, Mass Effect actually has an incredibly impressive and deeply emotional erotic part to it but it is a rarity. More often than not, we get adventurers fucking hookers, or silly quick time sex games or button mashing to fuck harder. This isn't the type of thing that detractors of sexual content in gaming are going to agree with, probably ever.

No I'm not saying that because lobbyists and complainers have stale sex lives that games should be the same, but there isn't a reason that sex can't be used as an emotional connector between characters either.

Games focused around getting the clothes off of a digital woman should be just as allowed to exist in our gaming spheres as the latest AAA blockbuster, but they don't further the cause of sex in video games as much as they could.

Not only do I believe that sex deserves to be a part of gaming, I think it deserves to have more credit as a part of the emotional story within a game. It doesn't need to be your character just getting his rocks off, or a nudge-nudge-wink-wink from the developers saying “we know what you gamers want, digital titties,” but a real way for players to connect with a character.

We talked a few weeks about about how Lara Croft's surviving of an attempted rape could be used to delve into all sorts of new character emotions within a game. How about include a sex scene in that game not long after the rape and make it optional. Have it so that players can decide. If she goes along with it, perhaps Lara is emotionally distracted and merely trying to forget a horrific experience, thereby not building a relationship with the male counterpart. Perhaps if she says no, players can learn something about his character.

Sex is a massive motivator in human life and it should be used in games as well, not just as a treat or a laughable aside, but a real part of the gameplay. It can be part of the story and part of the world the developers create.

It doesn't always have to be, just as not every single racing game has to be a sim like experience, but just now and again I'd like to see some real effort put into sex.

That last line could have been phrased better.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

tasteless

I don't think there should be sex in games unless developers want to make games specifically for that. Either that or it needs to be optional or implied instead of shown, because I don't want to have to pick and choose my games just because I don't want to see that crap. Yes it's in advertising, movies, tv, etc, but it really shouldn't be there either. It's private and shouldn't be used in mass media of any form. If people want that, then have a special market for it where you can know exactly what you're getting instead of mixing it in with other video games/tv/movies etc. A lot of people, like myself, don't want to see it. For something that should be kept private anyway, it needs its own special market and to be non-existent in the regular market. Like I said, make it implied or something. You don't need to show anything in order to make the characters connect better. Those details aren't needed and have nothing to do with making the game a good game. As long as it's implied via dialogue or something like that, that should be good enough for you all. If it's not, go watch porn or play ero games and don't subject the rest of us to it.

foolishness

i believe you said you don't want to have to pick and choose games. first of all that inplies you buy any old crap as long as it is branded a game. and if you don't want to see sex don't again the ratings come into play most sex would be implied or it would have a higher rating if you don't want it don't get R rated games easy fix and woth lack of details if it was just "some guy wanted to have sex with lara croft she didn't want it now she is sad" people would have just dropped it because the detail makes the difference

Sex is a big part of human

Sex is a big part of human world its 2nd only to Eating, so as one of the top 3 nature instinct humans have you'd think why should they deliberately leave sex out in games? We are already in a society that parents don't care either way what their child watches and its their fault not the developers of games. If you don't want to be subjected to it then either don't play the game or skip it either way no kid under the age of 16 should watch anything with sex in it. Blame the parents for not trying hard enough to stop their kids, if as much as 1 parent fails at their job their kids teach other kids bad stuff.

Sex

No kid under 16 should watch anything with sex in it? Why? Is sex dangerous somehow? Will it scar people for life by watching something that is as natural as breathing or eating? The main reason, in my opinion, people think that children shouldn't be subjected to sexual imagery and thoughts is because adults try to make it bad for them by making it shameful, taboo plays a big role here. Looking at other animals you can see that even sex between adults and children exists (most notably apes, whom we are closely related to), as a natural part of their lives. Of course, we illegalize sex with children because we don't want them exploited, but there's nothing intrinsically wrong with it. We make it shameful, and our children have to pay for it. So, on to sexual imagery again. How exactly does sexual imagery increase the exploitation of children? So, blame parents and society (and perhaps most notably, religion) for making sex shameful I say. And blame the educational system for not bringing up sex earlier. If sex wasn't considered shameful, and to many, a sinful act - then we wouldn't be having this conversation. Games with murder in them don't make psychopathic killers out of people, and sex in games don't make sexual predators or exploit cases out of people. Sex is private and should be between lovers? Perhaps to you, so are you people saying that you have sex with your TV-screen when there is a sex-scene? There's quite a difference between watching a sex-scene and engaging in it. Isn't kisses between lovers as well? So why don't I see you complaining about kissing in films and games? Again, sex is the issue, not privacy or "between lovers". There are so many other private things that are shown in films and games, and yet everything is about sex. I notice how my family (parents, the children adopt the reaction) reacts when there's a sex-scene, it's "Hrm hrm!!" or "*moans* quickly change channel or fast forward!". I was going to say it's childish, but a child wouldn't react that way unless an adult taught it to. Taught it to fear sex, taught it that it's shameful. So now we have loads of children and teenagers (and people who never grow out of it) who fear their bodies, their sexuality and their thoughts. To be horny and lust becomes a thought-crime. Not only that, children and teenagers who grow up in religious homes (thankfully, not all religious parents force their beliefs on their children) will even think that some pervert god is listening to every thought and watches their every move. Touching yourself? Shame on you! TL:DR version: Shame on parents, society and religion for making sex shameful.

You may be wrong...

Actually, I'd be inclined to say that yes, sex should be restricted from younger eyes, just as violence is. We keep sex extremely obscure in film and television for younger viewers because quite simply their minds and bodies are not ready for that kind of thing yet. Once you start allowing that kind of imagery in to the younger population you're opening avenues you really should rather see closed. That said, sex in gaming... as it was put in the original article I agree that sex is a strong emotional connector. When it's done well, it gives you, the player, a great deal of affection for the character you have been playing, as well as those you're surrounded by. Done poorly, some people will still enjoy it and those that don't will just go "Well that was a bad game". Done Well and Done Poorly are kind of complex though, which is why it's a good thing in general (That sentence was horrible.) Sex, like violence, can help to define a character purely because it's another influence in their lives. The more techniques available to a storyteller, the truer a character you will be able to find. Besides, in the case of Mass Effect you didn't have alien titties shoved in your face... it was a choice you made as a player, and if you didn't see it coming you probably need to get out more. All in all, yeah, I think sex has its place in video games... Honestly I think it's largely doing well as it is right now. I don't see anything in games I wouldn't read in my chosen fantasy books, nor read in those books I wouldn't see in a game... but hey, expression 'n all that. Long story short: NO U

violence restricted from younger eyes?

let me quote a few lines from a great "children's" movie series that i saw when i was a child: -- "i had to SLIT A FEW THROATS, but i got it!" -- "You've heard of the golden rule, haven't you? he who has the gold MAKES THE RULES" -- "i'm giving you your reward! YOUR ETERNAL REWARD!" (pulls a dagger out of his cloak) -- (laughing) "you dirty little thief!" -- (punches a man in the face) "THAT was for RUINING my wedding!" \\ any guesses? if you said Disney's Aladdin series (the movies, not the terrible TV show), then you're right! but i got no prize for you :( the point is, when you talk about slitting throats, corruption of power, theft, and violence as retribution, give it to millions of people for them to watch (disguised as a "kid's movie", might i add), and a few of them just happen to turn into bad apples ... it doesn't really prove the artform had anything to do with their actions, and restricting sex, like restricting violence, won't change that (as this movie BEING MARKETED TO KIDS isn't exactly "restricting violence" as you posted before). as for approaching my kids' attitudes towards sex, i'm less like my "it's only a movie, just ignore it" parents and even less like my "(awkward humming and hawwing)" half-retarded high-school teachers, and more along the lines of "you're obviously getting older, so i'll give you some basic info so you're not gonna have a terribly awkward social life like i did; just be smart about who you do it with and what protection/precautions you need to take, because you don't want to deal with the worst case scenario just yet." i'd rather be realistic about it than try to deny it altogether. if your son was getting beaten up every day on the playground at school, would you tell him to run to a teacher and get labelled a tattle-tale & keep the violence coming, or would you teach him a few quick moves to win a fight and get the pricks to leave your son alone? do you think the big bad bully is suddenly gonna rat? look like a tattle-tale to his bull-headed friends? it's like a drug dealer rattin to the cops so he can get less time in jail: someone else is gonna make sure he winds up dead. why? CUZ HE WENT TO THE COPS!! believe it or not, fighting fire with fire can work sometimes. embrace it, don't deny it

sex in games

So... aren't these games that include nudity or sex 16 +? Mass effect 3, The Witcher 2. Far cry 3 etc. They add to real life situations and feelings, curiosity, caring for your partner, excitement. and so on, it just adds more depth to the game. For me, the GTA mod that enabled you to control your character while having sex with your partner was over the top, unless you want to sit there for an hour jerking off to something like that. Sex is apart of life and is natural, its not something that should be focused on, but controlled so its not to over the top. Mass effect 3 or Witcher 2 makes it tasteful and sexy, same as many other games. we buy mature games, as in 18+ games for adults, so lets be treated like adults.

porn in games

So kids can kill, shoot, stab, and do everything else that goes in games but people wanna cry over a little bit of sex or tits. Grow the f*** up and quit b**ching ssabout something you do NOT have to be a part of. It is completely your choice to pick up a video game and play or your kids to play sel

well i dont think thats what it is

I think parents just want their kids to be kids , instead of growing up to fast. if you had a 3 yr old to 5 year old little girl and your playing a game that has some kind of sex in it would you be mad if your little princess if she came up pregant at age 6 or 7. you asked her why she did it " because i saw a game that you were playing thats why dad" i think that's the idea for the other parents but even i have ran in to a few games that don't list all the content on the back of the game.

Crybabies Suck

Seriously if a game offends someone then don't buy it or don't let your children buy it.But what gives anyone the right to tell a stranger they cannot play a game because they think its immoral. Just because "you" might not like the game because of its maturity rating or lack thereof. Doesn't mean you have the right to push your beliefs on me or anyone else. If I wanna spend my money that I earned from working on a game with gore,violence or even sex content so be it. GFY prudes of the world!

Fanfic

If you are butthurt about there not being sex in the games then read fanfic. There are LOTS of good stories out there and lots of them that have very in-depth sex scenes. Also, it's not that sex isn't ALLOWED in the games, (as stated quite a few times) it's that the developers are trying to target a larger audience. I'm not really for or against sex in games, I see all of your points and you have all made REALLY good points. It's also been stated that "If you don't wanna watch sex don't get it" that goes for the person saying that too. If it does not have enough sex in it for you, find something that does. I'm sure there are ways to make it to everyone's tastes, for example if they made two versions, one with the sex (AO) and one without, (PG-13) then it could solve the problem, because then you don't have to worry so much about the butt-hurt people saying there is too much sex in it. If you don't want to have the AO version an still enjoy the game, get the PG-13 version. I doubt my idea will ever happen, although I'm sure that in the next few years, sex will find it's way into video games soon. So I wouldn't really worry about it. I'm sure I'll get some flak for this comment, and I hope I don't come off as a hypocrite, (Someone will feel that I am or will be offended SOMEHOW as is with all my comments.) but I hope that you can see my point and that you can understand it. Constructive criticism is fine, but as I've been told, "If you ain't got nothing good to say, don't say nothing at all"

If it's within the age rating

If it's within the age rating and there is a warning for it, I don't see the problem in having it in games. I see worse things on regular television. If they somehow view this content while under-aged then you should ask how they acquired the content. I'm pretty sure they check I.D. if you seem to be to young to purchase these things. brb gotta yell at some kids on call of duty

If it is tagged for it of course

Our technology is advancing more and more each year. As developers gain more and more access to their game engines. I say push the envelope to make these virtual worlds more and more like real life. Why Real life? because that is what we all are familiar with. I think games should have more adult content. But if a nice game goes down that route, obviously tag them as MA, and if a game is MA then the retail stores that sell the product, the purchaser should have some kind of ID showing they are of age to buy the product. MA games should be rated for 21 or older IMO. I wish we did have more of these type of games. The problem is developers all have a hard time to mix adult content theme games as well as good game play. With out leaning towards the sex side, or to the game play side.

why over 21

in many countries the age at which we become adults is lower than 21 so why should we have to put up with been told what to think when our society considers us adult imposing your will over another is bad karma children need guidance adults are able to decide for themselves i dispair for young americans you really do mistreat your young adults (englan and wales 18= adult scotland 16= adult other countries may vary) :)an it harm none do as thou will :) Blessed Be

Isn't gaming supposed to be

Isn't gaming supposed to be an escape from real life? Why do you want them to be more realistic? Don't you have real life for that? Actually name your top 10 favourite games of all time. 90% of my favourites have a fantasy setting. For every 1 Vice City there are 10 Mushroom Kingdoms.

Value of photographs of attractive ladies.

Doubtlessly, of what I've seen, could only, possibly be an asset.Adding much of interest, and benefit. Building character, maturity, taste. Much to be desired, and pursued. Pin-point ladies sound of limb and intellect. Evident that ladies of intellect and sound limbs and wind are the focus of our search. Pray continue our search and pursuit.

I believe theres nothing

I believe theres nothing wrong with it, you get more attached to video game characters when you see them romantically bond with each other, after i had Commander Shepard make love with Jack before we went on the suicide mission i felt obligated to keep her alive, and i would of actually been hurt if she had died, so in my mind there is nothing wrong with it.

Most completely misunderstand the issue

Most people here (and apparently the person who wrote this article) completely misunderstand the issue and are content to sensationalize the hell out of it rather than educating themselves on what this whole thing is about. Everyone seems to assume that, since sexual content is restricted to a certain age group, everyone believes its evil and wants to pretend it doesn't exist. Not the most logical conclusion to draw, but there you have it. The truth is, sexual content is age-restricted because it is (in my opinion) universally agreed upon that such content isn't appropriate for a certain age range. Yes, sex is a part of life and is not evil in any way. Does that mean people should have sex when they're twelve years old? If you say "yes" to that, see a psychologist. That's the thing: yes, sex is a part of life. That doesn't mean people under a certain age need to be exposed to it. When they reach a certain level of maturity, let them bang each other silly; but I'd say most would be uncomfortable showing their wang to someone in elementary/primary school. Now for how this relates to this debate. Since sex is age-restricted, developers are excluding a certain percentage of the population from their game's market right off the bat. That is a certain percentage less people who will buy their game. Most developers don't like this, and maintain certain bounds of reason with their games to find a balance between pushing the edge and making a profit. Because of the age restriction on sex, most avoid it because they don't want to limit their market too much; not because they believe sex is evil. It's as simple as that. Many have said that videogames are for entertainment, and I say that's completely wrong. That may be what people BUY them for, but developers MAKE them to pay the rent and buy groceries. If your game doesn't sell, it doesn't matter how entertaining it is, it's not a successful game. Since this is how people make their living and money, it's reasonable to assume they don't want to shoot themselves in the foot too much by making a game that's hard to market for content reasons. Ergo, sex and extreme violence aren't usually done because developers want to get paid and investors in the game want a return. I'll say it again, and hopefully it will take root in some minds: NOTHING TO DO WITH SEX BEING EVIL, EVERYTHING TO DO WITH DEVELOPERS WANTING TO SELL GAMES. That's at the fundamental core of this issue: marketing and sales. Instead of taking time to analyze the debate and understand it, everyone seems happy to make snap judgements and assumptions as to what the whole thing is about, and then we get a bunch of people screaming for moar titties without having the slightest clue why developers don't do it in the first place. Until people decide it's okay for children to pork, I don't see this status quo changing, but please do keep sensationalizing the issue and screaming nonsense about conspiracies and religious beliefs and how sex is evil even though the ESRB hasn't made one single statement along those lines (nor have any decision makers on the rating system or video game development, as far as I know).

SEX IN GAMES

yeah i want it in games should be age restricted but i even think you missed the point there buckko i think it has something to do with people hiding away from society and getting used to the pornographic images in a game and then only looking for digital pornography and not really getting out there anymore it happening right now kids on ipads typing lol and not actually laughing out loud and thinking facebook is a realistic social life soon we will all be like in that bruce willis movie where we only send out robots and hide from the real world pork p

Anonymous, you are the one who misunderstands the issue

"That's the thing: yes, sex is a part of life. That doesn't mean people under a certain age need to be exposed to it." Um, this article (and pretty much any other that advocates sex being allowed in games) repeatedly says that the sexual content belongs in games rated MA, which should NOT be played by "people under a certain" age unless their parents are idiots. "Ergo, sex and extreme violence aren't usually done because developers want to get paid and investors in the game want a return." That is a half truth. Extreme violence is all over the place in games. What is the standard basic activity in most games? Killing people and things. Game manufacturers are perfectly happy to produce games that are rated MA for violence. And parents are idiots, because MA games rated that way for violence are purchased for kids all the time. Which serves as a fine indicator that parents are more than willing to buy a violent game for their kid, and the media really could care less. But, have the game be MA for sexual content and there is controversy. So, the issue really does come back to our culture being fine with children being exposed to violence but not to sex, and how that affects video games, and how that hurts games for those of us who are mature and want them to include things that are part of life. Like the article says. So, I think it is you who does not get the point. Now, as to my personal opinion on the matter... I think there was some validity to the Hot Coffee controversy, because in that case, the developer left content in the game that would have made it higher than an MA rating, and it was unlockable, so that someone could by the game based on the MA rating but then have content available that goes beyond MA. That is deceptive, and the developer deserved to be called out. On the other hand, there is a lovely tasteful love scene in Mass Effect that I feel does serve to underscore the attachment between Shepard and the love interest. Due to the ridiculous controversy started by Fox News out and out lying and claiming it is pornographic with full-frontal nudity (which it absolutely is not, it is absolutely PG-13), the love scenes were turned into people humping in their underwear in ME 2 and 3, and in the Dragon Age games. I feel this made them less effective from a story immersion standpoint, because the underwear never coming off made it all seem rather silly. It was actually more distracting than partial nudity would have been, since the partial nudity would have seemed more natural to what was going on.

GTA Hot Cofee

GTA's Hot Coffee mod was not unlockable, programmers made it as a joke, but then blocked it off from the game and made it impossible to get. Hackers got into it and found it. Also Fox News sucks so I think it's best to pretend they don't exist

I beg your pardon???

gamer's don't have sex???? **** me I must be imagining my four children my baby daughter (currently sleeping soundly bless her little toes :) ) must be a figment of my imagination. Also in the case of the hot coffee mod, give me mod tools with a 3d model importer that can support character rigs and animation and around two months and I could probably supply an interactive sex scene for most 3d game engines its not really that complicated in fact most dedicated teenagers could probably do the same (if they could focus long enough to learn how to use the design software and learn a little programming as well) but I digress it isn't all that difficult to get new animation sequences into a game engine then its just a case of designing an appropriate control system

What is natural.

What is less perverted, consensual sex or murdering 100 policemen a day? I mean seriously, why should the detailed imagery of ripping someones head off and vomiting acid down his throat (or whatever) have a higher age rating than seeing a character *gulp* naked? That´s a no-brainer right? Sex is natural, necessary and good, while drive-by shooting hookers is none of these things. Obviously, games relying on sex appeal to lure gamers in and cover up for shitty storyline/gameplay etc. will be put down by intelligent people, but people "misuse" sex appeal for things like that all the time, it´s just a sad fact of life that won´t be changed by treating nudity in videogames like the work of the devil. I´m pretty sure this will get sorted out by time, people are becoming less and less prudish every generation, so don´t feel down people and keep expressing your rejection of sex being a taboo, we will eventually break it.

Cultural Ignorance

****My Personal Opinion Follows****-****You've Been Warned**** ****Discussion Accepted and Encouraged**** SEX in VIDEO GAMES??? Since when has SEX been A BAD THING??? I just cant understand how the human species as a whole has become so intellectually advanced when ignorance, arrogance and media influence are spoon fed to us daily. The people in charge of Video Game Content is the government. A small handful of society that was "ELECTED" by the masses to decide whats best for the group, simply because society would rather be told whats "HOT", whats "TRENDING" and whats "ACCEPTABLE". "You are ENTITLED to you own opinion"..."ENTITLED"- a word that silences the whole by promoting conflicts between individuals. Just like this topic, instead of all of us working together to improve the Video Game Empire...we are on this editorial--discussing whether or not-- SEX-this countries one single weakness, should be in video games. The problem with a topic like SEX is how many different layers, emotions, feelings that can be associated to the word. I see no reason why a 007 Bond Game cant insert a more vivid encounter between Bond and whichever Bond Girl. But I also agree GTA/Saints Row dont need to incorporate rape or sexual abuse just to take the game to an even lower degree of criminal. SEX can be a beautiful meaningful activity, and yet it can be a moment of panic and terror to others. A powerful topic that deserves an intelligent discussion by knowledgeable individuals to achieve a level a maturity as a society above ignorance. The idea of SEX is EVERYWHERE. Its practically impossible to avoid. Every minute of our life is plagued with some sort of sexually propaganda; from the commercials on tv, to the songs on the radio, even the posters in subway stations and bus stops. So unless you dont watch tv, listen to the radio, and never have to leave your own home, SEX or the idea of it is a constant. When are we gonna learn that the more we try to limit access to anything, the more appealing and irresistible it becomes to those who cant access it. Why do 13-17 year olds smoke? Why do 15-20 year olds drink? Because both cases are frowned upon by society. We teach babies not to put things in their mouths yet they see us to every time we eat...but as that child grows and gains more knowledge RIGHT and WRONG are learned and understood. Yet we cant talk to teens about SEX because we would rather let society "PARENT" our children and then complain that society made em lazy, made em disrespectful, maybe it time to teach the children not just spoiling em. SEX is just another one of those things that hasnt hitched a ride on the evolution train yet. Times have long since changed from the days when a females ankle was the first thing youd see looking up a dress. And the ignorant ones that wanna sit by and argue sex isnt considered as romantic or intimate as it should be...then stop hiding sex from everyone and instead take time to inform and discuss the meaning of sex with anyone who will listen. But by no means am I saying "PREACH" to anyone or tell anyone how to feel, receive just as much information if not more than what you have to offer. The value of the "REWARD" is directly related to "RISKS" that had to be taken to achieve it. Knowledge alone plays a huge part on how each person interprets the RISKS. ****As Stated-This Is MY PERSONAL Opinion**** ****Open to Discussion****-****But Have Substance-Not Just Ignorance****

This is irritating.

Honestly people! This fight has gone on for YEARS!! Fighting whether sex is justifiable or not shares the same story with all the violence in the media. I'll try not to sound "preachy" or repetitive, but sex and violence ARE a part of life. They can range to be an emotional moment, whether the hero must decide such an action that may make an interesting mood, and teach the player the value of life, virtual or real...or to just giving a player the advantage to get his rocks off or just go commando on a bitch. But, consider how these two may be/are portrayed, or why they even exist AT ALL. From a historical point, violence and sex are both necessary things to utilize, as they either "make us or break us," and the way we use them separates us from animals and savages on a more understanding and higher level. And I know this is like "Well, duh! We KNOW that," but we sort of forget.. The only way this war over "Sex is bad, but violence is alright" and vice-versa is if both ideas are applied correctly, and in a way that can either shut everyone up and enjoy the moment, or invoke a strong message. Over all, when that day comes, maybe this dispute can come to an end, or we can just ignore these things all together, for better or worse. And not meaning to sound "douche-y", but if you're not satisfied with how games are made, just simply make your own that can. Video games are meant for entertainment, and they come in ALL forms and genres, don't forget that.

Many things are a part of life

The problem with "sex" in all forms of media is that it's not the point of a romance, it's just a tertiary aspect. We all know that two people who fall in love eventually have sex. We also know that the starving man who finally managed to kill a deer and gobble it down will eventually poop. You don't need to graphically display, or even mention, the sex or the poop to fully explore the conflict and tension of barely escaping starvation ... or the moving and slowly unfolding development of a romance. All attempts to do so ultimately trivialize the dramatic focus. And with sex, invariably cheapens the whole event and brings it to the level of pre-adolescent fantasy.

Cheapens it? Sex is usually

Cheapens it? Sex is usually the culmination of romance. Why do you think a lot of people wait for their wedding night? So what, is the first thing most people do when they get married «cheap», or just unimportant? Are you truly that misinformed?

Sure, true, but the way...

Sure, true, but the way it's being done in media and so forth is just: degrading, for an easy buck, or nasty for the sake of shock value. The way things are right now, it's no wonder there's been so many backlashes. The subject in of itself isn't what's so horrible or cheapening, it's the way people are letting this 'culmination of romance' be a poop fest of tits and ass.

Not a good article Pt. II

People don't seem to understand how the ESRB works or why they give the ratings they do. I'm not one to tell people how to live their lives, but you might want to read up on that before commenting on their practices. If you look at the list of AO games (only 21 as of now), you'll find such intellectually stimulating titles such as "The Joy of Sex," "All Nude Cyber," and "Manhunt II" (which was tagged AO for violence). Clearly the ESRB is persecuting the cream of the video game crop quite unfairly. How can a game called "All Nude Cyber" not have a gripping story and lovable characters? As I said earlier, sexual content is allowed in video games; and I actually found out that even explicit sex is allowed to a point under the M rating. So again, I don't understand what you people hope to gain from relaxing the sex restrictions. The only ones I've found that get the ax are ones that are clearly not in it for the proverbial art. The only step down from M is T, and I don't see anyone successfully arguing that explicit sexual content (no matter how plot-driven) is appropriate for someone thirteen years old. So there still isn't a strong argument for relaxing sexual restrictions in my opinion, as the only games to get AO for sex are blatantly erotic in nature. If you people are in such dire need for sexual content, there are limitless resources at your disposal on the internet. There's even 3D rendered porn for those who just absolutely have digititties. So once again, there's really not a good reason to relax these restrictions. The type of sex you people are talking about is allowed under an M rating; developers just don't do it. The sex that isn't allowed is the type that really shouldn't be. No conspiracy, no Communist takeover of America via the ESRB, no ridiculous puritanical prudes...just the rating board drawing a line between a five-minute passionate love-making scene and a two hour hardcore bondage orgy. I think that's a reasonable approach, and still don't see any strong arguments otherwise.

If you..

If you decide to call someone out for being wrong on something maybe you should know what the hell you're talking about. The average gamer isn't 16-24 like it is in your personal experience, The average game player is 30 years old and has been playing games for 12 years. The average age of the most frequent game purchaser is 35 years old. But the difference is I didn't just spitball I actually used references and knew my facts

There's a reason why games

There's a reason why games have ratings and age limits. If the game is geared more towards adult audiences, there should be no need to shy away from it unless it doesn't fold well with the story or gameplay. -Adults- can and should be able to handle such every day things, however, many parents get their kids these games, even though there's a content warning and age restriction on them and continue to complain that their son or daughter is being influenced by playing such a game... Well, don't get it for them. It has all the warnings and age limitations. Personally, people should start looking at the parents bringing up the topics about their kids playing adult themed games. Most of them go out and buy them either for their kid or themselves and then allow them to play it. If the content of a game ever comes into question, parenting should also come into question. The parent is supposed to monitor and maintain what their child does, not the gaming industry. Not to say that everything belongs in a game though.

It is a very strange paradox

It is a very strange paradox that we see in games, and in movies and television as well, that some parents seem quite content with letting their children watch acts of violence or participate in virtual acts of violence, sometimes very intense violence on a massive scale, but when it comes to the act of making life, we want keep them away from any exposure to that as long as possible. Why anyone might honestly think to themselves, "Well, God of War was a perfectly good game for my son, until I found out why he was mashing the O button so urgently," isn't all too clear to me, but this train of thought does exist, and it's not tremendously uncommon, either.

Wow

I'm assuming anyone can write an article on here? This was terrible. I'm all for a good debate, I don't agree with the writer but I would be a lot happier to agree to disagree if any of the arguments/reasons were actually good/explained well. The big reason I would have an issue would be children. Yes, I agree 100% that parents need to pay attention to ratings and sensor appropriately. However, ratings are getting more and more lax and there are plenty of games/movies/shows out now that have sex/violence/language that are still rated as appropriate for children/teens. I don't want to take my kids to GameStop and have to worry about what they will see on the cover of a game or on the previews screen. The same way I wouldn't want Walmart to have porn or vibrators out on display for my kids to see. As for the "adding to the character" argument, people don't play games to be humane and compassionate. No one is going to say (in the Laura Croft post rape example given) "Hmmm.... I feel like my character is messed up from that, so I'm going to make her have sex with this random stranger to cope" or "I think my character is doing pretty well after that, she has self respect so I think I'm not going to make her have sex with this character." People don't play games to think like that. The only way you would be able to make someone think like that is if you snuck it in and tricked them like Spec Ops The Line. Make your porno video games, just sell them in specialty stores or Castle's/Lover's Package.

Excuse me, who are you to say

Excuse me, who are you to say how people play their games? Someone who plays a game just for the sake of killing things is not going to care about their character, obviously, but I don't think the kind of sex scenes the article talks about are directed towards that kind of player. I do bond with the characters I play and care about their choices and many people do as well. I enjoyed the "dating sim" parts in Mass Effect, for example, not because "holy f*ck! I get to see blue tits at the end!" but as part of Shepard developing friendships and love for her teammates. And OH, YES, the children. You know, children have functioning brains capable of reasoning, you just have to explain things to them. If they can't handle something they glimpse on a cover at Gamestop without a breakdown, sorry, you need to step up and educate them. Sex exists, and like it or not, they will need to know about it someday. In the end, regardless of the way you want to raise your kids, it's your job as a parent to check the games, movies, etc they see, and if they contain things you don't want your kids seeing, don't buy them. Simple as that.

It doesn't belong in games automatically, but...

Who's to say that it shouldn't be? Games don't have to have ANYTHING to be good, but it's sad that sex due to it's lewd nature if often frowned upon something that is far more offensive and controversial such as war, murder, and outright manslaughter. Yet, these things get away free because they do not have a shame factor or an insecurity feeling attached to them. Sex is something that people are more uneasy to talk about even if it's someone who has committed a grave atrocity. Why sex is disdained because of it being more of something that people would rather stay quiet about instead of murder us a mystery to me. Human logic tends to cause me to cringe sometimes. People should be more open-minded to sex in general, it's natural, bloodshed isn't. Regardless I am a 17 year-old who does not think that sex and nudity should be embraced as much as death and destruction, as well as gore, horror, and other black sheep of human life.

Oops

I meant to say that sex SHOULD be embraced as much as or more than anything else out there due to it being natural to us and it makes us who we are.

Dude you're an idiot hyper sex addict Ga

Games are supposed to forms of entertainment IF you Really want Sexual entertainment you should look for Japanese games which provides you what you want AND NO AVERAGE GAMERS ARE NO 30 yr old Fatass AMERICANS !! you may be i'm not ! my friends aren't they're all like 16-24 ! GET YOUR FIGURES RIGHT !

Selfcentered

You are not the center of taking the average, look the numbers up yourself if you don't believe them, you'll find they're correct. Gaming has been around for much longer than you have, and those gamers have all gotten older. Of course, doing your own research takes more effort than leaving a retarded comment, so I guess we're all out of luck with people like you around. offtopic: captcha was "if it fits", lol.

I disagree with you, sex must

I disagree with you, sex must not be in video games, not because the age of the players, but because the global quality of many games will suffer because sex(who cares about the plot if there are titties on screen? so we hire more graphic designers and less script writters)

I disagree with you

actually this is a view that has been held even before video games came into being as we know them today. when movies started to become big you actually had to pay extra to have curse words in them (Gone With the Wind). Sex was also very much frowned upon in movies as well but it has become very much excepted in todays more liberal societies. Sure, there are some movies that are crap and are all about tits and ass but there are also plenty of masterpieces out there that continue to be made. This is why your argument, in my humble opinion, is wrong and when the video industry matures further you will find the same pattern occurring as what happened with the movie industry throughout its long history and it will be the better for it.

Nonsense

Your argument makes no sense at all. What the author is talking about here is a single sex scene or brief sexual content. Your assertion suggests that the sex would be all through the game. Sure, if sex is all through the game, plot would suffer. But one sex scene? I don't think so. The vast majority of gamers are adults. The games that would have sex scenes would be played by adults only or kids whose parents allowed them to play such games. The idea that sex should not be a part of gaming is ridiculous - it's a stupid limitation imposed on the gaming industry by the ESRB - an unregulated cabal of puritan despots who impose their brand of prudery on society because they fail to understand that adult-rated games are not for kids.

Pages

Add new comment