Braid Developer: Social Games Are Evil And Anti-social

Braid developer, Jonathan Blow, has attacked social games such as Zynga's Cityville and described them as "evil", "selfish" and "anti-social" games that are designed to "degrade a player's quality of life."

"Yes. Absolutely," was Blow's unhesitant reply to the question are social games evil? "There's no other word for it except evil. Of course you can debate anything, but the general definition of evil in the real world, where there isn't like the villain in the mountain fortress, is selfishness to the detriment of others or to the detriment of the world. And that's exactly what [most of these games are]."

"I'm not trying to say 'I know what's best for players and they shouldn't play these games'. It's okay to play social games to an extent. Like it's probably okay to smoke cigarettes to an extent, but what these designers do - and this is why I always go to it from the design standpoint - they very deliberately design the game to not give the player everything that they want, to string the player along and to invade the player's free time away from the game."

"Designers know what they are doing. They know when they show up in the office - 'My goal is to degrade the player's quality of life'. They probably won't think about that exact phrase. But [will think], 'My goal is to get people to think about my game and to put more money into my game and get other friends to play my game to the exclusion of all other games and all other things that they might do with their free time.'"

"That is the job description of those designers. And that's evil. It's not about giving people anything. It's about taking from people."

Add new comment

user name


Add new comment